5 Comments
Jun 14·edited Jun 14Liked by Marc Watkins

What I have found is that, contrary to saving me time, good use of AI in connection with lesson planning is actually more time consuming, but leads to higher quality. In other words, my best use of AI as a teacher results in something far superior than I would have been able to do otherwise, but still takes more time. I've been using it less and less over a wide range of tasks, but more deeply and deliberately on those tasks I do use it for.

Expand full comment
Jun 14Liked by Marc Watkins

I just wrote about the time issue relative to lesson planning. Teachers get a scant 4-10 paid minutes to plan a lesson. Hardly enough time to think critically about what you put in front of students. https://open.substack.com/pub/verenabryan/p/teacher-math-part-ii?r=a6rh&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
author

I hope we address the material conditions that impact educator's labor and not welcome AI as a solution to these problems.

Expand full comment
Jun 14Liked by Marc Watkins

What will the 24-25 school year look like without ESSER $, without enough teachers (my district is short 1390 licensed educators), and with AI-solutionism?

Hopefully, the traditionally conservative nature of education works in our favor.

Expand full comment

As a college English teacher of 19 years--watching fellow instructors and my students attempting to create something from scratch--I think AI is a great tool to move past the blank page. Because yucky words are better than no words to many people! So many people just can't START, and AI, like Steve said below, leads to higher quality work. That's my take!

Expand full comment